Blood
accounts for 8% of the weight of the human body. In the modern
forensic lab, serologists type it and geneticists profile its DNA.
Mystery authors and their readers are well aware of the value of body
fluids in identifying victims and assailants. But the spatters and
smears found at crime scenes have even broader applications in
providing useful information. In addition to "who", bloodstains can
determine the "how" and "where" of a violent attack.
For
some time I have lectured at an annual homicide seminar hosted by the
New York State Police. In the fall of 1998, while waiting my turn to
speak, I listened to a presentation by Dr. Henry Lee, director of the
Connecticut State Police Forensic Laboratory. Dr. Lee was using the
Nicole Brown Simpson murder to illustrate his specialty, describing
how bloodstains, either at a scene or on a suspect's clothing, can be
used to a reconstruct an act of violence.
I was
intrigued. What if the story told by blood disagreed with that given
by a defendant or eyewitness? Having just begun Deadly Décisions,
I decided to incorporate bloodstain pattern analysis into the plot. I
contacted colleagues at the FBI Academy in Quantico, at the R.C.M.P.
Forensic Identification Research Service in Ottawa, and at the
Laboratoire des Sciences Judiciaires et de Médecine Légale in Montreal
to learn all I could about spatter.
My
apprenticeship was more interactive than I'd anticipated. There is a
narrow side corridor at the LSJML, known to few, visited by fewer. The
hallway leads to a small white room where the ceiling and walls are
papered, and drops of blood cover every surface. Entering is like
stepping into a slaughter house. The analysts dribble, stomp, and
fling cow blood like post-modernist painters pelting a canvas.
Size
and shape are telltale indicators. Individual spots range from 1/8 to
as tiny as 1/1000 of an inch in diameter. The smaller the drop, the
faster it traveled, so size gives clues to the manner of attack.
Medium velocity spatter typifies an ax or hammer blow, while high
velocity scatter suggests gunshot trauma. Shape reflects
directionality. Droplets look like tadpoles or exclamation points,
with their tails pointing toward the place of the injury.
Interest in bloodstains isn't new, but the methodologies of analysis
have changed dramatically. Formerly, the point of impact was
determined by attaching strings to a surface at the position of a
stain, then stretching them back in the direction from which the blood
was believed to have come. The process was repeated, stain after
stain, string after string, until a giant web had been created. Home
plate was the point at which the strings converged. Today computers
combine the laws of projectile motion and the mathematics of
three-dimensional geography with sophisticated graphics, and "virtual
strings" determine the number of blows and the position of the victim
at impact.
I
find my work as a forensic anthropologist very satisfying. I enjoy
being part of a team that searches out facts and fits them together,
like pieces of a puzzle. Fragments of a shattered skull. Fingerprints.
Paint chips. Bloody spatters on a wall. As death investigators,
forensic specialists use these bits of information to establish truth
and reconstruct past events in an objective way.
The crime lab and autopsy room are my turf, the world in which my
stories take place. In Deadly Décisions Tempe Brennan is caught
up in a murderous biker war. The body count is high, including that of
a nine-year-old girl caught up as a bystander, and Tempe and her
colleagues muster all their forensic skills to bring the carnage to an
end. Bloodstain pattern analysis proves a useful tool in their arsenal
of scientific detection weaponry.
